Surround yourself around business minded people, success can be contagious. Lets think big, work hard, stay humble!

Showing posts with label company. Show all posts
Showing posts with label company. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 31, 2014

TQM - Total Quality Management


One movement that swept U.S. corporations in the 1980s involves maximizing quality and minimizing costs through total quality management (TQM). This refers to constantly improving the quality of products and the firm’s processes so as to consistently deliver increasing value to customers. TQM constantly asks, “How can we do this cheaper, faster, or better?” It involves worker teams and benchmarking. In its broader form, TQM applies quality improvement methods to all firm processes from production to customer service, sales and marketing, and even finance. By improving quality and reducing costs in all these areas Hewlett-Packard achieved spectacular results. Other companies that have successfully used TQM are Xerox, Motorola, Marriott, Harley-Davidson, and Ford.
Five rules determine the success of a TQM program:
1.   The corporate executive officer (CEO) must strongly and visibly support it with words and actions.
2.   The TQM program must clearly show how it benefits customers and creates value for the firm.
3.  The TQM program must have a few clear strategic goals; that is, it must ask, “What is the firm trying to accomplish?”
4.  The TQM program must provide quick financial returns and compensation – people need to see early and concrete result to continue to support the program.
5.  The TQM program should be tailored to a particular firm; that is, one firm cannot simply copy someone else’s TQM program.

Despite some glaring success from using TQM programs (e.g., Motorola was able to cut $700 million in manufacturing costs over five years), only about a third American corporations polled indicated that their TQM program had a significant impact in increasing the quality of their products, reducing costs, and increasing their competitiveness. The most frequent reason for failure for TQM programs is the failure of upper management to show a strong personal involvement and commitment to the program. Other reasons for failure were that TQM programs often were not strongly linked to the overall business strategy of the firm or aimed at delivering increasing value to customers. 

Tuesday, December 30, 2014

BENCHMARKING


Benchmarking refers to the finding out, in an open and aboveboard way, how other firms may be doing something better (cheaper) so that your firm can copy and possibly improve on its technique. Benchmarking is usually accomplished by field trips to other firms. The technique has now become a standard tool for improving productivity and quality at a large number of American firms, including some of the best-known, such as IBM, AT&T, Ford, Du Pont, and Xerox.
Benchmarking requires:
1.  Picking a specific process that your firm seeks to improve and identifying a few firms that do a better job, and
2.   Sending on the benchmarking mission the people who will actually have to make the changes.

Benchmarking can result in dramatic costs reductions. For example, through benchmarking, Xerox was able to cut the cost of processing each order from $95 to $35 and, as a result, save tens of billions of dollars. Similarly, benchmarking allowed Ford to reduce the number of employees handling accounts payable from 500 to less than 200 in a few months. Through benchmarking, the Mellon Bank cut complaints by 60 percent and was able to resolve them on the average in 25 days instead of 45 days. Benchmarking has now become a standard tool to increase productivity and minimize costs at many U.S. and foreign firms. The explosion in interest in benchmarking has led to the formation of many benchmarking associations, councils, conferences, courses, data, and consultants. 

Monday, December 29, 2014

The Strategic Alliance Boom


In the new global environment, with greater competition from more and more products and choices, alliances are not just a planning option but a strategic necessity. Strategic alliances are booming across the entire spectrum of industries and services and for a wide variety of purposes. According to Booz, Allen & Hamilton, the number of U.S. firms with partners in Europe, Asia, and Latin America is growing at a rate of 25 percent annually.
Why the boom? Here are several strategic reasons companies enter into alliances:
§  Fill gaps in current market and technology
§  Turn excess manufacturing capacity into profits
§  Reduce risk and entry costs into new markets
§  Accelerate product introductions
§  Achieve economies of scale
§  Overcome legal and trade barriers
§  Extend the scope of existing operations
§  Cut exit costs when divesting operations
Despite the many good reasons for pursuing alliances, a high percentage end in failure. A study by McKinsey & Company revealed that roughly one-third of 49 alliances failed to live up to the partners’ expectations. Yet such painful lessons are teaching companies how to craft a winning alliance. Three keys seem to be:
1.    Strategic fit: Before even considering an alliance, companies need assess their own competencies. Then they need to find a partner that will complement them in business lines, geographic positions, or competencies. A good example of strategic fit is AT&T and Sovintel, a Russian telephone company. The two joined forces to offer high-speed ISDN service for digitized voice, data, and video communication between the two countries. By joining together, the two telecommunications companies can offer new services for more business customers than either could do alone.
2.    A focus on the long term: Rather than joining forces to save a few dollars, strategic partners should focus more on gains that can be harvested for years to come. Corning, the $5-bilion-a-year glass and ceramics maker, is renowned for making partnerships. It has derived half of its products from joint ventures and even defines itself as a “network of organizations.” That network includes German and Korean electronics giants, and Mexico’s biggest glassmaker.

3.    Flexibility: Alliances can last only if they’re flexible. On example of a flexible partnership is Merck’s alliance with AB Astra of Sweden. Merck started out simply with U.S. rights to its partner’s new drugs. For the next phase, Merck set up a new corporation to handle the partnership’s $500-million-a-year business and sold half the equity to Astra. 

Monday, December 22, 2014

How Business and Marketing are Changing?


We can say with some confidence that “the marketplace isn't what it used to be.” It is changing radically as a result of major societal forces such as technological advances, globalization, and deregulation. These major forces have created new behaviors and challenges:
Customers increasingly expect higher quality and service and some customization. They perceive fewer real product differences and show less brand loyalty. They can obtain extensive product information from the Internet and other sources, permitting them to shop more intelligently. They are showing greater price sensitivity in their search for value.
Brand manufactures are facing intense competition from domestic and foreign brands, which is resulting in rising promotion costs and shrinking profit margins. They are being further buffeted by powerful retailers who command limited shelf space and are putting out their own store brands in competition with national brands.
Store-based retailers are suffering from an oversaturation of retailing. Small retailers are succumbing to the growing power of giant retailers and “category killers.” Store-based retailers are facing growing competition from catalog houses; direct-mail firms; newspaper, magazine, and TV direct-to-customer ads; home shopping TV; and the Internet. As a result, they are experiencing shrinking margins. In response, entrepreneurial retailers are building entertainment into stores with coffee bars, lectures, demonstrations, and performances. They are marketing an “experience” rather than a product assortment.

COMPANY RESPONSES AND ADJUSTMENTS
Companies are doing a lot of soul-searching, and many highly respected companies are changing in a number of ways. Here are some current trends:
§  Reengineering: From focusing on functional departments to reorganizing by key processes, each managed by multidiscipline teams.
§  Outsourcing: From making everything inside the company to buying more goods and services from outside if they can be obtained cheaper and better. A few companies are moving toward outsourcing everything, making them virtual companies owning very few assets and, therefore, earning extraordinary rates of return.
§  E-commerce: From attracting customers to stores and having salespeople call on offices to making virtually all products available on the Internet. Consumers can access pictures of products, read the specs, shop among on-line vendors for the best prices and terms, and click to order and pay. Business-to-business purchasing is growing fast on the Internet: Purchasing agents can use bookmarked Web sites to shop for routines items. Personal selling can increasingly be conducted electronically, with buyer and seller seeing each other on their computer screens in real time.
§  Benchmarking: From relying on self-improvement to studying “world-class performers” and adopting “best practices.”
§  Alliances: From trying to win alone to forming networks of partner firms.
§  Partner-suppliers: From using many suppliers to using fewer but more reliable suppliers who work closely in a “partnership” relationship with the company.
§  Market-centered: From organizing by products to organizing by market segment.
§  Global and local: From being local to being both global and local.
§ Decentralized: From being managed from the top to encouraging more initiative and “intrepreneurship” at the local level.

MARKETER RESPONSES AND ADJUSTMENTS
Marketers also are rethinking their philosophies, concepts, and tools. Here are the major marketing themes as the millennium approaches:
§  Relationship marketing: From focusing on transactions to building long-term, profitable customer relationships. Companies focus on their most profitable customers, products, and channels.
§  Customer lifetime value: From making a profit on each sale to making profits by managing customer lifetime value. Some companies offer to deliver a constantly needed product on a regular basis at a lower price per unit because they will enjoy the customer’s business for a longer period.
§  Customer share: From a focus on gaining market share to a focus on building customer share. Companies build customer share by offering a large variety of goods to their existing customers. They train their employees in cross-selling and up-selling.
§  Target marketing: From selling to everyone to trying to be the best firm serving well-defined target markets. Target marketing is being facilitated by the proliferation of special-interest magazines, TV channels, and Internet newsgroups.
§  Individualization: From selling the same offer in the same way to everyone in the target market to individualizing and customizing messages and offerings. Customers will be able to design their own product features on the company’s Web page.
§  Customer database: From collecting sales data to building a rich data warehouse of information about individual customers’ purchases, preferences, demographics, and profitability. Companies can “data-mine” their proprietary databases to detect different customer need clusters and make differentiated offerings to each cluster.
§  Integrated marketing communications: From heavy reliance on one communication tool such as advertising or sales force to blending several tools to deliver a consistent brand image to customers at every brand contact.
§  Channels as partners: From thinking of intermediaries as customers to treating them as partners in delivering value to final customers.
§  Every employee a marketer: From thinking that marketing is done only by marketing, sales, and customer support personnel to recognizing that every employee must be customer-focused.
§  Model-based decision making: From making decisions on intuition or slim data to basing decisions on models and facts on how the marketplace works.


Successful companies will be those who can keep their marketing changing as fast as their marketplace and marketspace.